As of Friday, Toyota had attracted more than a dozen class actions filed on behalf of consumers who allege that Toyota’s failure to adequately disclose problems with its accelerator pedals amounted to fraud. Despite the rising litigation, the consumer claims face a number of obstacles, according to some law professors and defense attorneys. Consumers will have to prove actual economic damages and assert individual claims that are consistent enough to merit class certification by federal courts.
No tags for this post.Related posts
Categories
Tags
accessible data actual damages arbitration attorneys backup tapes california rules california senate circuit court of appeals commercial purposes court of appeals cozen o connor cutting edge data mining disaster recovery backup discrimination suit economic reasons essential elements federal judge financial markets Firm Leaders first amendment gibson dunn health care data hostile work environment information disaster lawyer lawyers layoffs leadership legal circles litigation major publishers manhattan petition plaintiff reins sexual harassment skadden arps staff attorney staff positions statutory damages steven c bennett supreme court vote wolf blockTranslator
Blogroll
Recent Posts
- High Court Ruling May Fuel Battle Over Class Arbitration
- Senators Express Disgust, Anger as Goldman Execs Squirm
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply