A student loan company accused of hiding fees in loan agreements cannot force the lead plaintiff in a putative class action into arbitration, a New York federal judge has ruled, finding the terms of the loan unconscionable. Joshua G. Fensterstock, a 2003 Hofstra University School of Law graduate and now an associate at Isaacs & Associates in Manhattan, sued the lender and a loan processing company in 2008 over terms in his student loan that he claimed would cost him thousands of unforeseen dollars.
Tags: arbitration, court bars, federal judge, hofstra university school of law, isaacs, joshua, law graduate, loan agreements, loan processing, loan terms, manhattan, plaintiff, processing company, student loan companyRelated posts
Categories
Tags
accessible data actual damages arbitration attorneys backup tapes california rules california senate circuit court of appeals commercial purposes court of appeals cozen o connor cutting edge data mining disaster recovery backup discrimination suit economic reasons essential elements federal judge financial markets Firm Leaders first amendment gibson dunn health care data hostile work environment information disaster lawyer lawyers layoffs leadership legal circles litigation major publishers manhattan petition plaintiff reins sexual harassment skadden arps staff attorney staff positions statutory damages steven c bennett supreme court vote wolf blockTranslator
Blogroll
Recent Posts
- High Court Ruling May Fuel Battle Over Class Arbitration
- Senators Express Disgust, Anger as Goldman Execs Squirm
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply