A New Jersey judge has granted defunct law firm Ravin Sarasohn the right to pursue a rare case claiming that firm Lowenstein Sandler was complicit in the theft of confidential information, used it to woo key defectors and caused Ravin Sarasohn’s demise. The judge rejected Lowenstein Sandler’s argument that a ruling in a related arbitration favoring one of the defecting partners estopped Ravin Sarasohn and mandated dismissal of the claim. A lot more could happen to derail the trial scheduled for April.
Tags: arbitrationRelated posts
Categories
Tags
accessible data actual damages arbitration attorneys backup tapes california rules california senate circuit court of appeals commercial purposes court of appeals cozen o connor cutting edge data mining disaster recovery backup discrimination suit economic reasons essential elements federal judge financial markets Firm Leaders first amendment gibson dunn health care data hostile work environment information disaster lawyer lawyers layoffs leadership legal circles litigation major publishers manhattan petition plaintiff reins sexual harassment skadden arps staff attorney staff positions statutory damages steven c bennett supreme court vote wolf blockTranslator
Blogroll
Recent Posts
- High Court Ruling May Fuel Battle Over Class Arbitration
- Senators Express Disgust, Anger as Goldman Execs Squirm
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
- Mayer Brown Not Liable for Losses of Refco Investors, 2nd Circuit Decides
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply